[ppml] ULA
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Sep 18 11:16:37 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] ULA
- Next message: [ppml] ULA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The ULA proposal should say that all routers, everywhere, > should filter ULA/7 space --- by this I mean, blackhole > route, not ACL. (Plus ingress filtering on source IPs) It is not ARIN's business to tell ISPs what they should or should not do in their routers. However, it is the IETF's business to say such things, and lo and behold, what do we find here in RFC 4193, section 4.1 Routing? The default behavior of exterior routing protocol sessions between administrative routing regions must be to ignore receipt of and not advertise prefixes in the FC00::/7 block. A network operator may specifically configure prefixes longer than FC00::/7 for inter-site communication. Golly gee! Right there where it belongs > you can use whois to find out who it belongs to. > In the absense of ULA-Vixie (which letter is your's Paul?), > people like me are going to ask for PI space. (Thank you to > those who offered me a /48 out of their assignment, btw) Interesting. Not only can you register your RFC 4193 ULA address in this global registry: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ula/ You could also ask a friend at a smaller ISP to give you a /48 from their vast allocation. With so many ways to skin a cat, it is clear that ARIN doesn't need to worry about it from a policy point of view. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] ULA
- Next message: [ppml] ULA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list