[ppml] ULA
Scott Leibrand
sleibrand at internap.com
Mon Sep 17 14:01:30 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] ULA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kevin, All ULA space (L, C, G, or whatever) will come out of a single /7, which should be route-filtered on all DFZ routers. That's the main benefit of using ULA-* space rather than PI space for private addressing (and even private internetworking): everyone who isn't part of your private network can filter your routes with no additional effort, so they don't pollute the DFZ if they leak. -Scott Kevin Kargel wrote: > How will you know their announcement is ULA-C to filter it? Are you > saying that you will build a statement for every ULA-C for each ASN in > the world into your edge access-list? Or is there some aggregatable > filter list I am unaware of? Even if it were as few as 500 filter > statements, I would not be happy to have to extend an access list that > far, and I suspect the number of statements required would far outrun > that humble number. > > Feel free to educate me, I want to learn. > > Kevin > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On >> Behalf Of Iljitsch van Beijnum >> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:38 AM >> To: Paul Vixie >> Cc: ppml at arin.net >> Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 flawed? >> >> On 17-sep-2007, at 17:32, Paul Vixie wrote: >> >> >>>> Hmmm...Now...what was that long drawn out conversation....that >>>> addressed private space in a good way.....oh yeah! ULA-C! >>>> >>> ULA-C is apparently quite dead, since noone whose job includes >>> defending the DFZ from explosion believes that ULA-C would be as >>> "local" as ULA. >>> >> Riiiight... that must be why several people told me that PI >> is a good alternative for ULA-C, people holding a PI block >> will of course never be tempted to announce THAT. >> >> I'll be filtering ULA-Cs that people announce, or they'll be >> giving me enough money that I'm happy to accept the >> advertisements. No problem either way. >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to >> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact >> the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you >> experience any issues. >> >> > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy > Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. >
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Next message: [ppml] ULA
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list