[ppml] IPv6 flawed?
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Mon Sep 17 11:36:43 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] ULA
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Um, no... ULA-C is not a good way to address private space. ULA-C is a bad way to create PI under the table. Owen On Sep 17, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Azinger, Marla wrote: > Hmmm...Now...what was that long drawn out conversation....that > addressed private space in a good way.....oh yeah! ULA-C! > > Cheers! > Marla > > -----Original Message----- > From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net]On Behalf Of > Brian Johnson > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 7:00 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt; Kevin Kargel; ppml at arin.net > Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv6 flawed? > > > Ted wrote: >> >> You don't understand it because you are large enough to have your >> own allocation. >> >> For the orgs too small to meet justification requirements to get >> a direct allocation of IPv6 from an RIR, it is a big problem. >> >> They do not want to get IPv6 from an ISP AKA "local internet >> registry" >> and put time and money into numbering all their servers and >> suchlike - >> because if they find a better deal down the street from the ISP's >> (I mean local internet registry's) competitor, they want to be free >> to dump the existing ISP and go to the competitor without having to >> renumber internally. >> >> This IMHO is the single largest reason so many orgs adopted NAT. >> > > I agree with Ted that there is a noticeable benefit to having NAT > capability, but not that it is the "single largest reason so many orgs > adopted NAT." It does act as a pseudo-security feature, and it does > make > a network "portable". > > I would have no problem with a say a /32 of IPv6 being set aside as > "private space." This will only increase the longevity of IPv6 when > used > by companies who only need limited IP addresses and want to use > private > space and NAT. What arguments are there against this? > > - Brian > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the > ARIN Public Policy > Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN > Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the > ARIN Public Policy > Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN > Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
- Previous message: [ppml] ULA
- Next message: [ppml] IPv6 flawed?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list