[ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse Mapping Policy
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Thu Sep 13 06:22:49 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse Mapping Policy
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse Mapping Policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I have a hard time following the rest of the rationale. What > I can buy is asking ARIN to suspend/remove a name server if > it's inclusion in the DNS causes sustained negative > operational consequences. This is limited to the zone > involved (not the network), as that is the extent of the DNS "damage." The only way that ARIN can determine whether or not there is sustained negative operational consequences is to wait for complaints and then follow them up. They do this now. No policy is needed to cover this. There are no existing tools that can determine whether or not sustained negative operational consequences exist. You would need dozens of servers scattered around North America on several different ISP networks in order to detect sustained negative operational consequences. It is a waste of money to develop such a system in order to support a free service, i.e. in-addr.arpa hosting. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse Mapping Policy
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Modification to Reverse Mapping Policy
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list