[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines
Scott Leibrand
sleibrand at internap.com
Wed Sep 5 21:01:05 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-25: IPv6 Policy Housekeeping
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Bicknell wrote: > > ARIN today does sometimes do reviews outside > of a renewal request. I don't know when those occur today, but > they would also be an appropriate time. > > I don't think this language would increase (or decrease) the number > of times ARIN would ask for the information, it just clarifies what > they will ask for when they do ask. I'm not interested in changing > the frequency of review, just clarifing what happens when there is > a review. > Fair enough: as long as it doesn't require ARIN to review more than they otherwise would that's fine with me. -Scott
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-25: IPv6 Policy Housekeeping
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list