[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines
Member Services
info at arin.net
Wed Sep 5 08:44:04 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 30 August 2007, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded their initial review of "IPv6 Assignment Guidelines" and accepted it as a formal policy proposal for discussion by the community. The proposal is designated Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines. The proposal text is below and can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_24.html All persons in the community are encouraged to discuss Policy Proposal 2007-24 prior to it being presented at the ARIN Public Policy Meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 17-18 October 2007. Both the discussion on the Public Policy Mailing List and at the Public Policy Meeting will be used to determine the community consensus regarding this policy proposal. The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html ARIN's Policy Proposal Archive can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/proposal_archive.html Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Proposal 2007-24 IPv6 Assignment Guidelines Author: Leo Bicknell and Ed Lewis Proposal type: new Policy term: permanent Policy statement: Delete the text in 6.5.4.2 and Replace the text in section 6.5.4.1 with the following text: Assignments by LIRs /48 or smaller will not be reviewed by ARIN. Assignments greater than /48 will be reviewed to see if the additional space is warranted according to the 0.94 HD ratio policy. If the space is not warranted, ARIN will consider the excess space to be available for a different assignment, lowering the overall utilization score of the LIR. Rationale: The existing section 6.5.4.1 does not provide clear guidance on how ARIN should treat prefixes allocated to a site should an ISP come back for additional space in the future. This makes it difficult for LIR's to know if they are allocating in accordance with the rules under which they will be judged in the future. The existing section also provides no guidence on what the LIR or ARIN should do in the case a larger prefix is necessary. Timetable for implementation: immediate
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv6 addressing plans
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-24: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list