[ppml] The myth of IPv6-IPv4 interoperation, was: Re: Legacy /24s
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Mon Sep 3 12:38:17 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] The myth of IPv6-IPv4 interoperation, was: Re: Legacy /24s
- Next message: [ppml] The myth of IPv6-IPv4 interoperation, was: Re: Legacy /24s
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The point is that the transition to another address length > inherently means that hosts only implementing the shorter > length can't talk to ones only implementing the larger length > if those actually get to use that length as opposed to the > old length and a bunch of 0 bits. Hmmm... Hosts implementing globally unique IPv4 addresses can't talk to ones only implementing non-unique addresses. True on the surface of it, but in practice people use NAT proxies and a significant percentage of Internet traffic is between such incompatible IPv4 hosts. Given that IPv4-IPv6 proxying is as simple to implement as PNAT, one wonders why people are making such a fuss. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] The myth of IPv6-IPv4 interoperation, was: Re: Legacy /24s
- Next message: [ppml] The myth of IPv6-IPv4 interoperation, was: Re: Legacy /24s
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list