[ppml] Reducing unnecessary BGP announcements, was: Re: IPv4 address and routing slot markets
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sun Oct 28 11:25:52 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 address and routing slot markets
- Next message: [ppml] Reducing unnecessary BGP announcements, was: Re: IPv4 address and routing slot markets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 27 okt 2007, at 16:58, Paul Vixie wrote: >> What business does ARIN or APNIC or RIPE have in allowing or >> disallowing >> any kind of route announcements? It is not in the charter of ARIN >> or in >> the terms of reference of RIPE. Is there a significant number of ISPs >> who are about to sign some kind of routing treaty? > that's what tli advised us to do during his ARIN XX preso in ABQ. > as far > as i could tell, the ISPs in the room didn't immediately run out > into the > hall to discuss details. but that doesn't mean we oughtn't discuss > it, > since the predicted backpressure-free market mechanics don't seem > wonderful. Sometimes all it takes is someone with a vision and a route filter. How about this: out of the weekly routing table report and the RIR allocation record, a filter is created that removes unnecessarily unaggregated prefixes. The filter is sorted in order of decreasing number of prefixes filtered out. People then install the first X lines for whatever value of X best suits them. This will generate a lot of pressure on the worst offenders to do better.
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 address and routing slot markets
- Next message: [ppml] Reducing unnecessary BGP announcements, was: Re: IPv4 address and routing slot markets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list