[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-17: Legacy Outreach and Partial Reclamation - Revise
Member Services
info at arin.net
Tue Oct 23 13:37:51 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-23: End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to RIRs - Revise
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-14: Resource Review Process - Revise
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Policy Proposal 2007-17 Legacy Outreach and Partial Reclamation The ARIN Advisory Council (AC), acting under the provisions of the ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process (IRPEP), determined that while there is not community consensus in favor of the proposal there is consensus that the proposal should be revised and discussed further. The AC made this determination at their meeting at the conclusion of the ARIN Public Policy meeting on 18 October 2007. The Chair of the AC reported the results of the AC meeting during the Members Meeting. The AC Chair's report can be found at: http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XX/mem.html The AC will work with the author of the proposal to revise the text and return the proposal to the PPML for further discussion. The policy proposal text is provided below and is also available at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_17.html The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Policy Proposal 2007-17 Legacy Outreach and Partial Reclamation Author: Owen DeLong Proposal type: modify Policy term: permanent Policy statement: Modify section 4.6 as follows: 4.6 Amnesty Requests ARIN will accept the return or relinquishment of any address space from any existing address holder. If the address holder wishes to aggregate into a single block, ARIN may work with the address holder to arrive at an allocation or assignment which is equal to or smaller than the sum of their existing blocks and which best meets the needs of the existing holder and the community. There shall be no fee for returning addresses under this policy. Further, organizations returning addresses under this policy shall receive the following benefits: 1. If the organization does not currently pay ARIN fees, they shall remain fee exempt. 2. If the organization currently pays ARIN fees, their fees shall be waived for two years for each /20 equivalent returned, with any fractional /20 equivalent resulting in a one-time single year waiver. 3. Any organization returning address space under this policy shall continue under their existing RSA or they may choose to sign the current RSA. For organizations which currently do not have an RSA, they may sign the current RSA, or, they may choose to remain without an RSA. 4. All organizations returning space under this policy shall, if they meet other eligibility requirements and so request, obtain an appropriate IPv6 end-user assignment or ISP allocation as applicable, with no fees for the first 5 years. Organizations electing to receive IPv6 allocation/assignment under this provision must sign a current RSA and must agree that all of their IPv4 resources are henceforth subject to the RSA. Organizations taking this election shall be subject to end-user fees for their IPv4 resources not previously under an ARIN RSA. If they are already an ARIN subscriber, then IPv4 resources affected by this process may, instead, be added to their existing subscriber agreement at the address holder's discretion. Rationale: The current amnesty policy does a nice job of facilitating aggregation, which was the intent when it was drafted. However, as we approach IPv4 free-space exhaustion, the community now has an additional need to facilitate address reclamation. A very high percentage of underutilized space is in the hands of legacy holders who currently have no benefit to joining the ARIN process. Further, there is an unfortunate perception that doing so will require force the legacy holder into certain future disadvantages. This proposal attempts to resolve both of those issues while also providing some incentive to legacy organizations to start using IPv6 resources and bring their IPv4 resources into the ARIN process. This policy attempts to provide some benefit and remove most of the costs of making partial IPv4 returns. It also attempts to provide an incentive for these IPv4 holders to join the ARIN process. Timetable for implementation: Immediate
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-23: End Policy for IANA IPv4 allocations to RIRs - Revise
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-14: Resource Review Process - Revise
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list