[ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
John Curran
jcurran at istaff.org
Tue Oct 9 01:33:27 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 12:51 AM -0400 10/9/07, Dean Anderson wrote: >On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, John Curran wrote: > >> At 8:08 PM -0400 10/8/07, Dean Anderson wrote: >> >BTW, Curran has corrected himself: There is indeed no formal statement >> >on the subject from ARIN counsel. I've asked for a formal statement to >> >be produced, but haven't heard back whether they will do that. >> >> Dean - The request was noted and will be brought before the Board. > >Good. When can we expect to have this statement? I will bring the matter to the Board. I do not know the outcome at this time. >None of this is very definite. I'm sorry that you're having trouble assessing the situation and have heard the request for formal statement as noted above. >Someone should inform the IETF that Sprunk and Curran have misled them. > >The transcript is here >http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XIX/ppm1_transcript.html#anchor_13 Alas, Dean, I've given you my assessment, as has Steven. As the full transcript is online, so each may judge the situation on their own, and decide accordingly. /John
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list