[ppml] ARIN IP conservation and FREE IP Addresses

note, this thread has nothing to do with any policy proposal and as such,
probably ought to be on arin-discuss@ rather than ppml at .  for the benefit
of those who are subscribed here but not there, who may be following it,
i am honouring the existing CC: header.  but at some point we ought to
pare down ppml@ to actual policy proposals rather than general discussion.

> I do think it is reasonable and in line with the mission of ARIN to
> execute fees that are in addition to the existing fees that would go to
> support a robust education program aimed at objectives like, legacy
> recovery, IPv6 understanding/adoption, etc.

i've likewise heard randy bush's claim (most recently at the chicago IEPG
meeting) that public funding has helped push IPv6 deployment in asia.  am
i to assume that the "public funding" mechanism being recommended here is
a "sin tax" administered by ARIN?  (that feels like mission creep, but
before i say whether i think it's good or bad, i'd like to be sure i'm
understanding what's been suggested.)