[ppml] SPAM-WARN:Re: IPv4 Soft Landing -DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested

Sorry! Forgot to reply all.

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [mailto:mike at mathbox.com] 
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:05 PM
> To: 'Randy Bush'
> Subject: RE: SPAM-WARN:Re: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing 
> -DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
> 
> Randy,
> 
> Yes, aggregation is a technical issue. If you have issues 
> with aggregation, get a bigger, smarter router. But John Doe 
> (the living one) should be able to plunk down his $100 and 
> get an IP block, irrespective aggregation issues.
> 
> Michael Thomas
> Mathbox
> 978-683-6718
> 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy at psg.com] 
> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 7:54 PM
> > To: Michael Thomas - Mathbox
> > Cc: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: SPAM-WARN:Re: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing 
> > -DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
> > 
> > > 5. I do not believe ARIN should be involved in routing 
> > policy (meaning
> > > aggregation). That does not mean that I think that ARIN 
> > should not plan
> > > around aggregation. Aggregation is a technical issue not a 
> > poilcy issue and
> > > should not impact any ARIN policy.
> > 
> > brilliant point.  so we can stop worrying about ipv4 free 
> > pool run-out,
> > not be bothered by irrelevant (to policy) technical issues, 
> > and just set
> > policy that we continue assigning from what we now call D/E 
> space and
> > just continue northward, and eventually assign from 256/8 and 
> > so forth.
> >  right.
> > 
> > please get someone in your organization to show you a router.
> > 
> > randy
> > 
> >