[ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing -DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Oct 5 19:54:10 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing -DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
- Next message: [ppml] SPAM-WARN:Re: IPv4 Soft Landing - DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> 5. I do not believe ARIN should be involved in routing policy (meaning > aggregation). That does not mean that I think that ARIN should not plan > around aggregation. Aggregation is a technical issue not a poilcy issue and > should not impact any ARIN policy. brilliant point. so we can stop worrying about ipv4 free pool run-out, not be bothered by irrelevant (to policy) technical issues, and just set policy that we continue assigning from what we now call D/E space and just continue northward, and eventually assign from 256/8 and so forth. right. please get someone in your organization to show you a router. randy
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing -DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
- Next message: [ppml] SPAM-WARN:Re: IPv4 Soft Landing - DiscussionandSupport/Non-SupportRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list