[ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
Bill Darte
BillD at cait.wustl.edu
Fri Oct 5 10:26:13 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Seems to me that since there exists a vocal segment of the community that wants ARIN to engage the legacy holders and to encourage or impose upon them some obligations or limit their 'free' services, it is wise that ARIN consider what authority exists...should the broader community come to believe as the vocal segment. Discussion of this authority and options to BOTH encourage or impose... in an open and straightforward manner is the right thing to do. IMO. If the legacy community feels threatened by such, then I encourage all to better understand the process in which such discussion is taking place and the means that exists to influence those discussions and community perspective...by engaging the community at large and ARIN through participation. Bill Darte ARIN Advisory Council -----Original Message----- From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of William Herrin Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:46 AM To: John Curran Cc: ppml at arin.net Subject: Re: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments? On 10/5/07, John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote: > In any case, both legacy holders and ARIN appear to have > obligations to the community. ARIN will certainly do as the > community directs, but one wonders if the legacy community > would like us all to forget their community obligations and > simply pretend that their assignments were done in a total > contractual and community obligation vacuum... John, Don't take me wrong; I think the current ARIN process is a sound one and I think it would be healthy to bring as many folks into the fold as possible. I'm particularly fond of proposals which encourage IPv4 assignments to segue into IPv6 assingments with both coming under the ARIN RSA in the process. I don't think the "stick" approach is healthy. Even just having discussions about discontinuing folks' RDNS creates a comment record where any legacy registrant lurking about must think we're all a bunch of a-holes. How that activity and perception furthers ARIN's mission completely escapes me. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
- Previous message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Next message: [ppml] Counsel statement on Legacy assignments?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list