[ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested

With the explanation that the 100% efficient utilization of the previous
IP allocation is part of the current requirements, I think I understand
how this proposal fits in with the current policies.
 
I don't have an objection to this proposal.
 
Keith

  _____  

From: David Conrad [mailto:drc at virtualized.org] 
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 6:25 PM
To: Keith W. Hare
Cc: Bill Darte; ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and
Support/Non-SupportRequested


Keith, 

On Oct 2, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Keith W. Hare wrote:

	I don't know for sure what it means to demonstrate efficient
utilization of 100% of an IP allocation.  For the definitions I can
think of, I'm sceptical that is possible to honestly demonstrate
efficient utilization of 100% of an IP allocation.


I was told by ARIN staff that 100% utilization of all previous
allocations is an _existing_ requirement.

Regards,
-drc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/attachments/20071005/fb3c2495/attachment.html