[ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-Support Requested
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Oct 4 18:27:40 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-Support Requested
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-Support Requested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David, On Oct 2, 2007, at 3:08 PM, David Williamson wrote: > Does it matter if that happens slower as a result of policy changes? The point of a "soft landing" proposal is to extend the runway for transition, but do so in a way as to discourage procrastination. The answer to whether it matters is likely a subject opinion. Clearly I think it does (or I wouldn't have bother to make the proposal), but opinions vary. Regards, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-Support Requested
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-Support Requested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list