[ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and Support/Non-SupportRequested

Bill,
 
I don't know for sure what it means to demonstrate efficient utilization
of 100% of an IP allocation.  For the definitions I can think of, I'm
sceptical that is possible to honestly demonstrate efficient utilization
of 100% of an IP allocation.
 
If this can be turned into something that doesn't require applicants to
lie, I don't object to it.
 
Keith

  _____  

From: ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of
Bill Darte
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:11 PM
To: ppml at arin.net
Subject: [ppml] IPv4 Soft Landing - Discussion and
Support/Non-SupportRequested



Hello,

 

As shepherd of the ARIN Policy Proposal: IPv4 Soft Landing, I would like
to ask the community to once again consider this proposal in advance of
the Albuquerque Public Policy and Membership Meetings
(http://www.arin.net/ARIN-XX/index.html) and voice support or
non-support for this proposal with concise reasoning. More information
about this proposal and other active proposals can be found at
http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/proposal_archive.html

 

Such an effort will refresh this discussion and perhaps air more
recently conceived viewpoints.  It will also aid the Advisory Council in
their efforts to assess industry consensus about this proposal.

 

Thank you for your interest and involvement in the ARIN Internet
Resource Policy Evaluation Process (IRPEP).  More information about
IRPEP can be found at http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html

 

 

Bill Darte

ARIN Advisory Council

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/attachments/20071002/aa6b7847/attachment.html