[ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
Cort Buffington
cort at kanren.net
Wed Nov 14 13:33:41 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, then I to accuse an entire body -- such as the ARIN membership of this. Myself included. Probably worse for me. I know better, but use the excuse that I don't have the time to donate to help educate the world and be active enough to try and be part of swaying such proposals before they happen rather than just bad-mouthing them after they've been produced by hard-working folks who do take the time to put them together. I spend time on the PPML armchair quarterbacking rather than on the IPv6 Wiki contributing information. Michael, I take your comments to heart. To the Wiki with me. On Nov 14, 2007, at 12:25 PM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: > >> I agree completely with Yurie. This proposal only proves that >> the policy-makers at ARIN are incapable of thinking in the >> IPv6 paradigm, and continue to think that IPv6 is IPv4 with >> larger address space. > > I also agree with Yurie, however I disagree with you. > > How would you feel if people went around saying that Cort Buffington > is > incapable of thinking in the IPv6 paradigm and continues to think that > IPv6 is IPv4 with larger address space? Because that is precisely what > you *ARE* saying about Cort Buffington. > > And you can trust me on this because I read it on the ARIN PPML and > that > is a pretty authoritative source of information. > > In case you don't quite get this variation on the pot calling the > kettle > black, you, Cort Buffington are one of the ARIN policy-makers so any > slur that you cast on this group is a slur on yourself. > > I'd also like to note that this is a proposal submitted by one > individual and does not reflect the views of ARIN policy-makers > until it > has passed the gauntlet of this list, a members' meeting and an > Advisory > Council meeting. To reiterate, I agree with Yurie that this policy > is a > bad idea for many reasons and I don't think it is productive to list > them all. > > --Michael Dillon > > P.S. I tend to agree with you that there are too many people still > stuck > in IPv4 thinking who just don't get IPv6 yet. But that is an education > problem more suitable to deal with on the ARIN IPv6 wiki at > http://www.getipv6.info than on PPML. > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the > ARIN Public Policy > Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN > Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > -- Cort Buffington Assistant Director for Technical Services The Kansas Research and Education Network cort at kanren.net Office: +1-785-856-9800 x301 Mobile: +1-785-865-7206
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal Name: IPv6 Assignment Size Reduction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list