[ppml] Effects of explosive routing table growth on ISP behavior

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> Brian Johnson wrote:
>>
>> MY ENTIRE POINT IS THAT ARIN NEEDS TO STAY OUT OF ROUTING POLICY!
>>
>
> I understand your point, I just disagree with it, and am presenting
> arguments to the contrary.
>
> How do you propose we administer IPv4 after the exhaustion of the ARIN
> free pool?  Should we allow transfers of any and all addresses down to
> /32 regardless of the impact on the routing system?  Should we simply
> deny all IPv4 requests, and require everyone to get PA space from ISPs
> who have it?  Does that constitute anticompetitive behavior?

FWIW, I agree with Scott's arguments on this.  I think everyone agrees 
that RIRs should stay out of the business of guaranteeing that 
whatever they allocate or assign are routable.  However, I can see 
only downsides in not trying to design allocation/assignment policies 
in such a manner that the routing system behaviour could be on a more 
sustainable basis.

"Must advertise the least specific superblock" is IMHO a good 
expectation is to set.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings