[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue May 29 14:56:18 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> In the late 90's not a purchase order went out without "Must be Y2K > compliant" stamped on it (for whatever it was worth). These days, the PO's > need to go out "Must be IPv6 compliant" -- except that 1/1/2000 was a hard > date, and IPv6 isn't. and, more importantly, the belief that money was effectively infinite (inda like ipv6 address space:) is no longer widely held. we actually have to *justify* spending it on a hard to perceive and no clear profit major change. randy
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list