[ppml] Policy Proposal: 2007-12 IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal
MAEMURA Akinori
maem at nic.ad.jp
Wed Mar 21 21:46:48 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: 2007-12 IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: 2007-12 IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo, Thank you very much for your simplification on our proposal and summarization of the discussion. It is not "over-"simplification but precisely figuring out our motivation and original idea. Regards, Akinori P.S. - I must admit it is very hard for me to catch up all discussion on this mailing list, even in my native language it should be tough. In message <20070320233652.GC37431 at ussenterprise.ufp.org> "Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal: 2007-12 IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal" "Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org>" wrote: | While I think there has been a lot of good discussion generated | from the IPv4 policy, a lot of it has strayed from the original | policy proposal. I'm going to attempt to bring that back around a | bit as we need to tackle the issue of address space exhaustion. | | To that end, I'd like to oversimplify the proposal. Language, | format, and justification aside I believe the proposal can be boiled | down to the following simpler statement: | | The RIR's, in order to assure the orderly shutdown of IPv4 | allocations should do their best to predict the date at which | there will be no more IPv4 addresses available, should announce | a termination date just before the predicted exhaustion, and | should cease allocations on that date even if there is some | address space still available. | | I believe the intent of the authors is to realize a number of potential | benefits: | | - There is a well known date at which no more IPv4 space will be | available, making it easier for those needed addresses to show their | management the need for alternate plans. | | - By the RIR's shutting down distributions of addresses at the same | time it prevents the "last RIR standing" from being swamped by every | international company solely because they still have addresses. | | Of course, there are drawbacks: | | - This requires global coordination. | | - We may leave some IPv4 space unused that could otherwise be put to | good use. | | - This policy itself may cause a run on IP space. | | There are alternatives, Owen DeLong just wrote about what would probably | be considered the opposite viewpoint in another message, I quote: | | I believe that the system will function and that there is no need | to do anything different until ARIN is unable to fulfill requests. | At that time, ARIN should fulfill request it can on a | first-come-first-serve basis and provide a polite apology in | response to requests which cannot be fulfilled. I do not believe | a change of policy is required in order for ARIN staff to do this. | | Last, in an attempt to keep the discussion focused, I'd ask you to | consider if these related topics are relevant to this policy's thread, | along with why I think most are not: | | - Reclamation of unused address space. It doesn't matter if we do this | or not, all predictions are we still run out of address space. All | this does is move the date, which is a valid discussion but the topic at | hand here is what happens when the RIR's have no more space to | allocate. | | - Encouraging people to use less IPv4 addresses, including but not | limited to higher fees, required use of NAT, rejustification of existing | IPs. Same issue, it delays the date we run out, but doesn't change | the problem of what the RIR's should do when they run out. | | - Are the predictions of when we run out correct? Same problem, doesn't | matter if it's 2010, 2020, or 2050, the question is what do we do when | it happens. | | I'd like to see all three of those issues discussed, just in another | thread. | | -- | Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440 | PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ | Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org | | | | _______________________________________________ | This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List | (PPML at arin.net). | Manage your mailing list subscription at: | http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml | | |
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: 2007-12 IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: 2007-12 IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list