[ppml] Legacy and other IPV4 recovery
Cliff Bedore
cliffb at cjbsys.bdb.com
Sat Mar 17 11:34:12 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Having just been invited to join this discussion group as one of the "legacy" Class C net owners, I've been reading a lot of messages lately about recovering unused IP addresses. I have several comments/questions about the effectiveness of doing this. I don't have the long history of this group so forgive me if I state something covered before. First, given that ISP's who have been allocated addresses by ARIN are more likely to be using/have some justification for retaining their address allocations, it would seem that most successful recovery would come from the legacy allocations that went to companies who for some reason no longer use their addresses. It also seems to me that the larger allocations from the "legacy" period would be more likely to still be active and most of the recovery would be from the early Class C allocations. It would also seem likely that it would be difficult to recover contiguous blocks of Class C address space. Given all those assumptions to be true and understanding that routing to non-contiguous Class C addresses can clog router address tables, would the recovery of all these addresses and subsequent re-issue in fact cause more harm than good because the router table growth? Also from a personal curiousity point of view, in reading this group, it seems that all legacy numbers were assigned to ARIN. Is this true and if not, how does one find out where all the individual Class C addresses are physically located? If some are, in fact. located outside ARIN's domain, how would they (ARIN) be able to do any recovery if such addresses were found? Without the long (to me at least) history of the group, I don't know if this has been discussed but am curious about the validity of my assumptions above and what would be the impact on recovery effectiveness if they are true? For some background, my Class C was issued in 1990 and for a while was not connected but has been since 1992-3 or so connected via dialup and then DSL via a series of ISPs. Therefore I don't have any routing complexity myself and am covered by my ISPs ASN. Cliff -- Cliff Bedore 7403 Radcliffe Dr. College Park MD 20740 cliffb at cjbsys.bdb.com http://www.bdb.com Amateur Radio Call Sign W3CB For info on ham radio, http://www.arrl.org/
- Previous message: [ppml] Getting aggressive about vetting
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list