[ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Wed Mar 7 14:38:03 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a message written on Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:18:23AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> As far as what there is for a RIR to do, RFC 3180 is indeed
> automatic. RFC 3138, for GLOP extensions, says that
> (Section 3)
>
> Globally scoped IPv4 multicast addresses in the EGLOP space are
> assigned by a Regional Registry (RIR). An applicant MUST, as per
> [IANA], show that the request cannot be satisfied using
> Administratively Scoped addressing [RFC2365], GLOP addressing
> [RFC2770], or SSM. The fine-grained assignment policy is left to
> the
> assigning RIR.
I think you could structure a strong polcy proposal using that
paragraph as a springboard.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/attachments/20070307/f2f396fe/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: IPv4 Countdown - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list