[ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
Marshall Eubanks
tme at multicasttech.com
Fri Mar 2 14:06:43 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments- not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dear Andrew; On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Andrew Dul wrote: >> -------Original Message------- >> From: Marshall Eubanks <tme at multicasttech.com> >> Subject: Re: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address >> Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal >> Sent: 02 Mar '07 10:19 >> >> Hello; >> >> On Mar 2, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Member Services wrote: >> >>> On 1 March 2007 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded its >>> review of >>> the proposed policy 'eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments' and did >>> not >>> accept it as a formal policy proposal. >>> >>> Citing RFC 2050, the AC concluded that ARIN was not empowered to >>> administer multicast address space. >> >> I must admit that I do not understand this reasoning, and intend to >> petition / appeal this. >> >> RFC 2050 / BCP 12 merely says WRT multicast that >> >> This document does not describe private Internet address space and >> multicast address space. > > I would also tend to agree. > > To me, RFC 3180 specifically asks the RIRs to administer this space. > > However, I also realize administration of multicast space is > something new for the RIRs and we need to consider this before > jumping in. This policy proposal, as written, is probably not > complete enough as written and needs further work (specific > allocation criteria, etc). I will be working with Filliz Yilmaz of RIPE to help get this into appropriate shape for them. I would be glad to hear suggestions on or off list as to how to do that. > The other issue that don't know if it has been considered with is > the issue of ensuring uniqueness between RIRs . Do we expect IANA > to chop up the eGLOP space and give a chunk to each RIR? > That is a good question - as written, it does. However, it would also be suitable to have only one RIR take this on, or even to set up a new entity just for this purpose. > Andrew > > Regards Marshall >
- Previous message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments - not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Proposed Policy: eGLOP Multicast Address Assignments- not accepted by AC as formal policy proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list