[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-7: Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP Requests/Assignments
Member Services
info at arin.net
Fri Mar 2 12:13:31 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6: IPv4 PI minimum size change
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-7: ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1 March 2007 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded its review of 'Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP Requests/Assignments' and accepted it as a formal policy proposal for discussion by the community. The proposal is designated Policy Proposal 2007-7: Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP Requests/Assignments The proposal text is below and can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_7.html All persons in the community are encouraged to discuss Policy Proposal 2007-7 prior to it being presented at the ARIN Public Policy Meeting in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 23-24 April 2007. Both the discussion on the Public Policy Mailing List and at the Public Policy Meeting will be used to determine the community consensus regarding this policy proposal. The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html ARIN's Policy Proposal Archive can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/proposal_archive.html Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Policy Proposal 2007-7: Creation of Policy for Subsequent End-User IP Requests/Assignments Author: Alex Rubenstein Proposal Version: 1 Submission Date: 15 February 2007 Proposal type: New Policy term: Permanent Policy statement: 4.3.6, Additional Assignments "In order to justify an additional assignment, end-users must have efficiently utilized at least 80% of all previous assignments, and must provide ARIN with utilization details. The prefix size for an additional assignment is determined by applying policies 4.3.2, and 4.3.3." Rationale: There are no published criteria for additional assignment requests from end-user networks. NRPM 4.3 seems to only cover initial assignments. NRPM 4.3.3 states, in part, "Requesters must show exactly how previous address assignments have been utilized and must provide appropriate details to verify their one-year growth projection." Unfortunately, the above text does not specify any metrics for ARIN staff to apply when determining if an additional assignment is justified. Though most end-users only get one assignment, some end-users request a 2nd or 3rd or Nth assignment. Currently, the ARIN staff applies what they perceive to be "efficient utilization" criteria; for instance, the end-user must have utilized at least 80% of last assignment and must provide ARIN with utilization details. Timetable for implementation: Immediate
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6: IPv4 PI minimum size change
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-7: ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list