[ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Mon Jun 18 14:42:40 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo, Just to clarify: On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:06:47AM -0400, John > Santos wrote: >> It's easy to shoot down a proposal if you just assume it says >> something >> it doesn't. > > I wasn't addressing the proposal at all, I was addressing David > Conrad's > interpretation of it, and most importantly his question of what would > happen if his view were to come true. I am extrapolating based on behaviors I see being discussed or implemented in all the RIRs regarding the liberalization of PI allocation policies. Your extrapolation of my extrapolation made assumptions that John is pointing out aren't necessarily valid. The availability of PI to anyone who asks does not imply that the address space is routed nor does it imply PA space magically goes away or is deaggregated. Rgds, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list