[ppml] Avoiding Square 0 (IPv4 NAT at endusers) (Was: Difference between ULA-C and PI)
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Jun 8 14:56:32 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Avoiding Square 0 (IPv4 NAT at endusers) (Was: Difference between ULA-C and PI)
- Next message: [ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> IPv4 address space is already abused by service providers to > "up-sell" services, there's no reason to think it won't continue with > IPv6. IP addresses are not supposed to be property and addresses are > supposed to be allocated on need. they are. anyone is welcome to show need to the regional IR and get what they need. of course, they have to pay there too. oh, you do not want to pay for so big a chunk? well then, add what it costs to allocate, dns, route, configure, ... those little chunks, and expect to pay that to your upstream isp. life is simple randy
- Previous message: [ppml] Avoiding Square 0 (IPv4 NAT at endusers) (Was: Difference between ULA-C and PI)
- Next message: [ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list