[ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
John Santos
JOHN at egh.com
Thu Jun 7 19:19:13 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Paul Vixie wrote: > > The magic words, "private network", appeared in the next paragraph > > you snipped, don't remember if I made it clear I was talking about > > private internets, not intranets. > > what's a "private" internet? I mean an internet (a network of networks) between different organizations, but not (directly) accessible to the Internet. Connections could be via private lines, VPN tunnels over the public Internet, dialup, or whatever. An "intranet" is a network within an organization, which doesn't necessarily face the same problems. Much has been made of the definition of "the Internet" as the largest set of host defined by the relation "reachable by each other" (as I understand it) in some recent posts. There are many other internets, networks encompassing cooperating entities, which contain hosts that are not reachable from the Internet at large but are reachable by each other, and which have some hosts that are part of "the Internet." They need non-colliding addresses. RFC1918 might work fine, if a single person or group were managing address assignments (and the private internet were small enough), but I'm talking about intERnets, not intRAnets, that is, these networks belong to and are managed by different people, groups, companies, or organizations, so RFC1918 addresses are very likely to collide. Assigning unique addresses to all the involved organizations would prevent the collisions. I realize that given the pending crunch in ipv4 addresses, it may not be possible/practical to assign even /24's to all organizations who might need them, but there is *no excuse* for not allowing for this in ipv6. Whether it is ULA-C or PI is immaterial. > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > > -- John Santos Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc. 781-861-0670 ext 539
- Previous message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Next message: [ppml] Suggestion for ARIN to deligate smaller IP blocks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list