[ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Jun 7 13:13:36 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
- Next message: [ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It looks to me the primary difference is expectation of cost/ allocation restrictions. I gather ULA-C isn't supposed to have any. However, I'm not sure as I'm waiting for a non-expired ULA-C draft. Rgds, -drc On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unverified key: 06/07/07 at 07:28:56 > > As near as I can tell, the only difference between ULA-C and PI > is that ULA-C will potentially have slightly more breakage than PI > because some ISPs will filter at least some of it (as they > theoretically should). > > Beyond that, ULA-C is distinguishable from PI only in the minds > of the people who imagine it is a good idea. > > Owen > > > * Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> > * Issuer: DeLong Consulting - Unverified > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml > > > * PGP Signed by an unverified key: 06/07/07 at 07:28:56 > * text/plain body > * Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> > * Issuer: DeLong Consulting - Unverified
- Previous message: [ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
- Next message: [ppml] Difference between ULA-C and PI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list