[ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
Paul Vixie
paul at vix.com
Mon Jun 4 12:20:12 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> good luck. i managed to get rid of TLAs etc. get tvtf out of policy, > /48, /56, ... but EU164 is infinitely more religious. TLA's are dead. 8+8 is dead. A6/DNAME is dead. EUI64 can also die. i realized recently that if IPng was going to just be IPv4 with larger addresses, then we didn't need flow labels or any of that other stuff, and we could have reused the IPv4 ethertype and framing, just revved the version number field and defined 128 bit src/dst and been able to implement and deploy it in a year. (and many people suggested this at the time, though none of them said "this is how we ought to do it since it's how we'll end up doing it ever after we define all this other crud.")
- Previous message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Next message: [ppml] [address-policy-wg] Those pesky ULAs again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list