[ppml] Dean Anderson, 130.105.0.0/16 and the future of the IPv4 Internet.]
Leroy Ladyzhensky
leroy at emailsorting.com
Thu Jul 26 12:02:59 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Dean Anderson, 130.105.0.0/16 and the future of the IPv4 Internet.]
- Next message: [ppml] Dean Anderson, 130.105.0.0/16 and the future of the IPv4 Internet.]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
very well put... and I agree ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Williamson" <dlw+arin at tellme.com> To: "Dean Anderson" <dean at av8.com> Cc: <ppml at arin.net> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [ppml] Dean Anderson,130.105.0.0/16 and the future of the IPv4 Internet.] > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:07:00AM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: >> 3. Alter the procedure to remove board members. I have been in >> discussion with Lee Howard, and there is no way to remove Vixie before >> October, about when his term expires. > > Very well...this gives you two choices. Either wait for his term to > expire and lobby for him to be replaced by someone else, or start the > removal process. You won't get Mr. Vixie removed any faster unless you > convince him to step down, which I see as very unlikely. > > In the meantime, I think we all very clearly understand your position > with regard to Mr. Vixie. As near as I can tell, you see him as a > source of great evil. Based on the fact he was elected to this > position, a large number of the ARIN membership do not agree...unless > you wish to also propose that the ballot box was stuffed. > > In any case, we continue to be extremely clear on your point of view. > Can you *please* refrain yourself from sharing that point of view on > the public policy mailing list? It's hard enough to keep up on some of > the znier points of view on the various v6 proposals (which have become > plentiful enough to require a scorecard to keep separate) without > additional useless chatter on this list. > > Seriously, please take it somewhere else. The bickering is doing > nothing good for this list, and is probably forcing some people to > start simply ignoring the entire list, which is a shame. As Bill > Woodcock pointed out, we have to get some of the v6 decisions made at > the next meeting, and people's input is required now. > > In case I haven't been clear enough in my request - and I really hope I > have been at this point - please stop posting to ppml unless you are > discussing one of the policy proposals that is on the table, or wish to > propose one yourself. > > Thanks. > > -David > _______________________________________________ > This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List > (PPML at arin.net). > Manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml >
- Previous message: [ppml] Dean Anderson, 130.105.0.0/16 and the future of the IPv4 Internet.]
- Next message: [ppml] Dean Anderson, 130.105.0.0/16 and the future of the IPv4 Internet.]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list