[ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
Seth Mattinen
sethm at rollernet.us
Thu Jul 5 20:24:48 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: bill fumerola [mailto:billf at mu.org] >> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 2:31 PM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt >> Cc: 'ARIN PPML' >> Subject: Re: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:08:19PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >>> OK, then how exactly is this fact an argument AGAINST arin >> simply removing >>> these records out of it's whois? Which is what I am suggesting? >> who does that hurt? the legacy holders or the rest of the community >> trying to use a tool to find out who to contact when that netblock does >> something foolish. >> >> as a paying ARIN member, i want ARIN to keep track of as much as they're >> legally, financially, technically allowed to. that WHOIS service is more >> useful to me, the paying ARIN member, not the legacy holder. > > For now. What about post-IPv4 runout? > How does whois become less useful after that point? ~Seth
- Previous message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Next message: [ppml] IPv4 "Up For Grabs" proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list