[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives

top postiing to annoy.. :)

	i THINK that for the legacy holders I know, the value add
	for them in entering into a relationship w/ ARIN is one
	of keeping data current/fresh...  like getting records updated.
	the value add for ARIN is that there is/becomes an unambigious
	tie as ARIN being the recognised successor in interest from
	the original registry.

	little or nothing to do w/ IPv6 and only tangential bearing
	on reclaimation.   at least from this neck of the woods.

--bill

> 
> I think we're on the same page here.  We (not you and I) seem to be
> overly concerned with incenting or dis-incenting the swamp holders into
> returning their space to ARIN.  If they can get IPv6 space with no
> hassles and there are no real benefits to reclaiming the space in terms
> of buying us additional time in a IPv4 world, why do we care?  I'm not
> sure how modifying ARIN policy in regards to swamp holders is going to
> promote the transition to IPv6.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael K. Smith
> mksmith at adhost.com (work)
> mksmith at mac.com (!work)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This message sent to you through the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List
> (PPML at arin.net).
> Manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml