[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Jul 4 05:59:51 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> the world has changed. we would like to change those > contracts. well, we're gonna have to *negotiate* that. and > acting unilaterally or arbitrarily will only polarize and > make a mess we just don't need. We have been negotiating. Many legacy holders have turned in addresses or signed the RSA. Stanford University is one place that did the work of renumbering to return addresses. In any case, at some point we have to say enough is enough. We give people the opportunity to play ball but when they refuse to come on board, we have to act unilaterally. I believe that we are now at the point, due to IPv4 exhaustion being so near, where we have to give people ONE LAST CHANCE, and after that act unilaterally. We won't be acting arbitrarily because ARIN is an open organization and any actions will be discussed openly until we come to a consenus. This is our strength and I believe that when ARIN finally does act, it won't polarize anthing and will not create a mess. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list