[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Jul 4 05:47:53 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I think that for most legacy holders, the "Fees" issue is a > matter of principle or a minor issue. I think that the real > issues from the legacy holder perspective are: > > - I don't get any benefit from signing an RSA You become a legitimate holder of IPv4 address allocations. > - It subjects me to policies that could force me > to renumber It frees you from being forced to renumber when some other company decides to "borrow" your addresses due to IPv4 address shortages. > - It subjects me to policies that could change at any time It gives you a formal vote in ARIN policies and since you are now a legitimate holder of address resources, other ARIN members are more likely to listen to your point of view. > - It potentially limits my options in terms of > what I can do > with my address space The only option I can see that disappears is the option to sell the addresses and this is pretty marginal if they are not legitimately registered with ARIN. > - It costs me money Money is not an issue here. The sums are nominal. It can cost a lot more in lawyers fees or forced renumbering when (not if) someone takes your addresses as we reach the point of IPv4 exhaustion. > I think it provides some encouragement towards reclamation. > I think that gentle reclamation efforts allowing people to > return address space in whatever size chunks they are willing > to and on whatever timetable they are willing to is more > likely to result in reclamation than policies which attempt > to force the issue. You seem to be presenting "reclamation" as a positive thing which we should bend over backwards to encourage and entice. I take a different view. Reclamation is an obligation under ARIN policies which require companies to *JUSTIFY* their address allocations. When that justification disappears, likely due to IPv6 migration, companies have an obligation to return the addresses to ARIN. It is not too late for a controlled migration combined with reclamation to prevent IPv4 exhaustion entirely. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list