[ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
Andrew Dul
andrew.dul at quark.net
Mon Jul 2 12:04:44 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In general I support the idea to provide a policy that would allow legacy holders to exchange or reduce their assignments easily. A few notes below. Andrew > > On 6/28/07, OWEN DELONG <[LINK: mailto:owen at delong.com] owen at delong.com> > > 1. If the organization does not currently pay > ARIN > fees, they shall remain fee exempt. I would support a fee waiver for a specific number of years (maybe 10?) not an indefinite waiver. > > 2. If the organization currently pays ARIN > fees, > their fees shall be waived for two years > for > each /20 equivalent returned, with any > fractional /20 > equivalent resulting in a one-time single > year waiver. Here I would like to see a cap on the maximum number of years they receive a fee waiver. > > 3. Any organization returning address space > under > this policy shall continue under their > existing > RSA or they may choose to sign the current > RSA. > For organizations which currently do not > have an RSA, they may sign the current > RSA, or, > they may choose to remain without an RSA. I personally believe that any action that an organization has with an RIR at this point should be done with a valid RSA in place.
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Resource Reclamation Incentives
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list