[ppml] FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-InputRequested
Howard, W. Lee
Lee.Howard at stanleyassociates.com
Mon Jan 29 14:11:57 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-InputRequested
- Next message: [ppml] FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-InputRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Jordi > > De: Stephen Sprunk <stephen at sprunk.org> Responder a: > > might argue about the placement of the bar (i.e. the number of > > assignments), but it's hard to argue with the need for _some_ bar. > > We're talking about consuming global routing table slots > here (even if > > ARIN doesn't explicitly acknowledge that). We can't just give them > > out to anyone who asks without _some_ justification showing > they have > > a bona fide need for such. > > Agree, routing table slots are important, but we can't go > beyond "ultra-conservation" artificially and against freedom > of business establishment. Can it be a case for a court ? I > don't think we should even risk for that possibility. What does "freedom of business establishment" mean? Just so I can properly prepare, in what way do you imagine this going to court? What would be the case made against ARIN? Thanks, Lee
- Previous message: [ppml] Fwd: FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-InputRequested
- Next message: [ppml] FW: 2006-7 IPV6 Initial Allocation suggested changes-InputRequested
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list