[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-5: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "multiple /48" justification
Member Services
info at arin.net
Fri Feb 16 18:06:20 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-4: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "interim" consideration
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-7: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria - revised text
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 15 February 2007 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded its review of 'Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "multiple /48" justification' and accepted it as a formal policy proposal for discussion by the community. The proposal is designated Policy Proposal 2007-5: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "multiple /48" justification. The proposal text is below and can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_5.html All persons in the community are encouraged to discuss Policy Proposal 2007-4 prior to it being presented at the ARIN Public Policy Meeting in San Juan, Puerto Rico, 23-24 April 2007. Both the discussion on the Public Policy Mailing List and at the Public Policy Meeting will be used to determine the community consensus regarding this policy proposal. The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html ARIN's Policy Proposal Archive can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/proposal_archive.html Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Policy Proposal 2007-5: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "multiple /48" justification Author: Jordi Palet Martinez Proposal type: delete Policy term: permanent Policy statement: Delete section 6.5.4.2. of NRPM. Rationale: The current text requires the LIR to justify to the RIR/NIR when assigning multiple /48s to a single end site. It seems that the reason for this requirement is the lack of experience, which seems unreasonable after a few years this policy has been implemented, even if may not have been specific cases which used this policy section. It seems useless, now that there is already deployment experience, to require a justification from the LIR to ARIN for assigning multiple /48s (or a shorter prefix, such as for example a /47). It is up to the LIR to require the justification to its own customers and decide according to it. The LIR will be already responsible to justify to ARIN the usage of any allocated block(s) when requesting for more, and this will already implicate an implicit justification of this kind of assignments. With this policy change, both ARIN and LIR staff will save resources in a justification, which seems unnecessary and should be completely on the hands of the LIR itself. No financial/liability implications for the community and ARIN are foreseen. No special conditions, fees, exceptions, etc. seem to be required. Timetable for implementation: Immediate
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-4: Changes to IPv6 policy - removal of "interim" consideration
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2006-7: Changes to IPv6 initial allocation criteria - revised text
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list