[ppml] Policy Proposal: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Information from NRPM
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Thu Feb 15 18:49:50 EST 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Information from NRPM
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Informationfrom NRPM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shouldn't this go in an RFC similar to RFC 2050? Owen On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:33 PM, cja at daydream.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to have some discussion here about this. For the > time being I have withdrawn this proposal. The reason is that it > seems that the information that it strikes is information that the > ARIN staff uses to help guide LIRs to assign reasonable blocks to > their customers. When an LIR assigns /40s to each of its customers > just because, ARIN can point to the guidelines as to what more > reasonable assignments are. It is pretty much a given that this > information needs to exist somewhere but it's not quite policy. > I'd like your thoughts about this. > > One idea is to have a document that's like the NRPM but contains > operational guidelines for LIRs. Maybe like an NPOG (Number Policy > Operational Guidelines). >
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Information from NRPM
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Informationfrom NRPM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list