[ppml] Policy Proposal: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Information from NRPM

I support this policy.

Owen

On Feb 10, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Member Services wrote:

> ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the  
> ARIN
> Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being
> posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being  
> placed on
> ARIN's website.
>
> The AC will review this proposal and may decide to:
>
> 1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as it is presented;
>
> 2. Work with the author to:
>       a) clarify the language or intent of the proposal;
>       b) divide the proposal into two (2) or more proposals; or
>       c) combine the proposal with other proposals; or,
>
> 3. Not accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal.
>
> The AC will review this proposal at their next meeting. If the AC
> accepts the proposal, then it will be posted as a formal policy  
> proposal
> to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting. If the AC
> does not accept the proposal, then the AC will explain that decision;
> and at that time the author may elect to use the petition process to
> advance their proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the
> petition fails, then the proposal will be closed.
>
> The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at:
> http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html
>
> Mailing list subscription information can be found at:
> http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> Policy Proposal Name: Removal of Ipv6 Operational Information from  
> NRPM
>
> Authors:
> Lea Roberts
> Cathy Aronson
>
> Proposal Version: Version 0
>
> Submission Date: 8 February 2007
>
> Proposal type: Modify
>
> Policy term: Permanent
>
> Policy statement:
>
> The following parts of Section 6.5.4.1 should be removed from the
> Number Resource Policy Manual (NRPM).
>
> NRPM Section 6.5.4.1 states:
>
> The following guidelines may be useful (but they are only
> guidelines):
>
> * /64 when it is known that one and only one subnet is needed
>
> * /56 for small sites, those expected to need only a few subnets
> over the next 5 years.
>
> * /48 for larger sites
>
> Rationale:
>
> Discussions in recent public policy meetings, as well as in Advisory
> Council meetings, have led to the consensus that operational
> information, such as these IPv6 guidelines, should be removed from the
> NRPM. This section is a clear example of text not directly related to
> ARIN policy and so it is proposed that it should be removed.
>
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML mailing list
> PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml