[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-21: PIv6 for legacy holders with

> 
> Cliff Bedore wrote:
> > It would not work for me.  I am not multi-homed.  I have a single DSL line to
> > my upstream provider.  I know in the best of all worlds I would be but I'm not
> > now.  I think the problem is that there are a fair number of legacy people who
> > are like me.  They are probably /24s since that was what was given if you
> > coouldn't justify a /16.
> >   
> 
> Ok.  In that case, would you be able to route an IPv6 PI block if you 
> got one?  Is the inability to get IPv6 PI space holding you back from 
> adopting IPv6?

Frankly, I'm sure I'll be at least semi-retired and maybe dead before IPv4
disappears. ( and while I'm 60, my folks are 90 and my grandmother will be 107
in September so we're looking at a long time. :-) )  I would have to get my
current upstream ISP to start routing IPv6 and their comment so far has been
"We'll be ready when IPv6 gets here".  I'm simply willing to start looking at
v6 and start a push from the bottom to get v6 adopted and available.

If ARIN has no desire to give legacy v4 holders such as me IPv6 space, I'll just
stay with v4 and give up trying to keep up with the PPML mailing list.

> 
> I'm sure there are legacy /24 holders who wouldn't be able to get IPv6 
> PI space under this proposal, but what I'm really trying to address are 
> people for whom that is holding them back from adopting IPv6.
> 
> -Scott
> 


-- 
Cliff Bedore
7403 Radcliffe Dr. College Park MD 20740
cliffb at cjbsys.bdb.com http://www.bdb.com
Amateur Radio Call Sign W3CB For info on ham radio, http://www.arrl.org/