[ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses - AC did not accept
Dean Anderson
dean at av8.com
Tue Aug 28 17:54:34 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses - AC did not accept
- Next message: [ppml] Technical reason why /52,/56,/60,/64 are bad
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'll rewrite the proposal as a change to the policy manual, and resubmit it. --Dean On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Member Services wrote: > On 23 August 2007, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) concluded its review > of the proposed policy 'Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP > Addresses' and did not accept it as a formal policy proposal. The AC did > not accept the proposal because it presents an approach, rather than > defines a policy. There are no details around how or where it adds to, > or alters, the current version of the NRPM. > > During the initial review period the AC may decide to: > 1) Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as written. > 2) Postpone their decision regarding the proposal until the next > regularly scheduled AC meeting in order to work with the author. > 3) Not accept the policy proposal. > > In the event that the AC decides not to accept the proposal, then the > author may elect to use the petition process to advance the proposal. > For petition details see the section called "Petition Process" in the > ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process which can be found at: > http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html > > The deadline for the author to initiate a petition per the ARIN Internet > Resource Policy Evaluation Process is 40 days prior to the meeting; the > petition deadline for the ARIN XX Public Policy Meeting is 23:59 EDT, 7 > September 2007. If the author chooses not to petition or the petition is > unsuccessful, then the proposed policy is closed. If a petition is > successful, then the proposal will be numbered and posted for discussion > and presented at ARIN's Public Policy Meeting. > > Regards, > > Member Services > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > Member Services wrote: > > ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the ARIN > > Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being > > posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being placed on > > ARIN's website. > > > > The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review this proposal at their next > > regularly scheduled meeting. The AC may decide to: > > > > 1. Accept the proposal as a formal policy proposal as written. If the > > AC accepts the proposal, it will be posted as a formal policy proposal > > to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting. > > > > 2. Postpone their decision regarding the proposal until the next > > regularly scheduled AC meeting in order to work with the author. The AC > > will work with the author to clarify, combine or divide the proposal. At > > their following meeting the AC will accept or not accept the proposal. > > > > 3. Not accept the proposal. If the AC does not accept the proposal, > > the AC will explain their decision. If a proposal is not accepted, then > > the author may elect to use the petition process to advance their > > proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the petition fails, > > then the proposal will be closed. > > > > The AC will assign shepherds in the near future. ARIN will provide the > > names of the shepherds to the community via the PPML. > > > > In the meantime, the AC invites everyone to comment on this proposal on > > the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning > > behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough > > vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations. > > > > The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at: > > http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html > > > > Mailing list subscription information can be found at: > > http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/ > > > > Regards, > > > > Member Services > > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) > > > > > > ## * ## > > > > > > Policy Proposal Name: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses > > > > Author: Dean Anderson > > > > Proposal Version: 1 > > > > Submission Date: 8/18/07 > > > > Proposal type: new > > > > Policy term: renewable > > > > Policy statement: > > > > ARIN will ration the remaining available IP Address Space according to a > > decreasing exponential function in the family of e^(-x), where the > > ultimate function and factors are chosen to ensure that the remaining IP > > address space lasts for at least 10 years. > > This function will be used to limit the IP Address space allocations. > > If IP Address Space becomes available (e.g. via return), the ration can > > be recalculated. However, Ration calculations will not be based on > > projected or anticipated returns. Contested IP Address Space will also > > be excluded from the amount of available Address Space for ration > > calculations. > > > > Rationale: > > > > Two reports[1,2] project that IP Addresses will be exhausted around > > March 2010. > > > > * Both reports agree that if IP Addresses continue to delegated at the > > present rates, we will run out of space in March 2010. > > > > * Everyone seems to agree that depletion will be a very bad event. > > > > * It is therefore imperative to begin rationing to slow down the rate of > > new delegations to conserve the available address space. > > > > * It is necessary to do this now. One can't start rationing after the > > resources run out. > > > > Sudden IPv4 IP Address Exhaustion is expected to cause sudden disruption > > and discontinuity in business operations and planning. As with other > > limited resources, the mere anticipation of exhaustion will lead to > > hoarding and other behaviors that increase the harm of a sudden exhaustion. > > > > Rationing on a decreasing exponential will essentially prevent total > > exhaustion and will gradually decrease the rate of IP Address delegation > > so to alleviate the harms of a sudden stop in IP Address delegation. > > > > Prevention of IPv4 IP Address Exhaustion will help ensure a smooth > > transition to IPV6. > > > > Rationing helps ensures that IP Address space remains available to > > future needs. > > > > > > [1] http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html > > [2] http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/ipv4-pool-combined-view.pdf > > > > Timetable for implementation: Immediate > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > PPML > > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy > > Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). > > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services > > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy > Mailing List (PPML at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > > -- Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service? www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service 617 344 9000
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses - AC did not accept
- Next message: [ppml] Technical reason why /52,/56,/60,/64 are bad
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list