[ppml] Free Market
Jonathan Barker
jonathan at qx.net
Sat Aug 25 10:17:50 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses
- Next message: [ppml] Free Market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
All, I have a proposal. In an earlier e-mail someone made mention of the word 'oil'. IPv4 addresses are like oil, in that it is a finite resource, and one day... we will run out. The way our economic markets handle this is simple. Increase the price of oil. Allow economic demand to set the price, and as the price of oil increases, other, often environmentally friendlier technologies take hold. What if we increased the price of new ipv4 allocations, across the board - and altered the current pricing scheme, such that those with legacy /8s pay what they are truly worth. This would be an incentive for those who have large volumes of unused space just sitting there to get rid of it, but also allow growth and use for those who are willing to pay for it. IPv6 prices, of course, remain forever at rock bottom. If you inserted economics into it - you might see some large blocks being returned. I know of one ISP here in Lexington that has 130,000 legacy IPv4 addresses. They use... maybe 2000. In fact, if Arin were to turn down a request for me - they'd be my first stop. I'd buy a t-1, with a /19 attached. I can't use the T-1 of bandwidth - but I'd certainly advertize the space out my Gig-E or OC12 links. That is an example of what some of us have to do to get additional IPv4 space in a hurry. I know starting up, we had to get our address space from upstreams. When we'd cancel an upstream... .renumbering time! Now that we have ARIN space, we don't have to do that - but if ARIN can't assign it - I'll certainly 'buy' it from someone else using the method detailed above. Paying monthly for "bandwidth" but actually for IP space. So, one way or another when IPv4 becomes scares, restricted or unavailable, the market will handle it. Why not shift the burden now onto those who hold all those massive allocations, and use ARIN to regulate the price of IP space. Maybe we should even be fair about it, and charge a fee for each and every address assigned by Arin. I'd be happy with 30 cents, per IP address, per year. That would be a nice incentive for those who don't use their space, to return it. It would also speed the switchover to IPv6, by inserting an economic incentive to do so. That's my 30 cents. Jonathan
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Decreasing Exponential Rationing of IPv4 IP Addresses
- Next message: [ppml] Free Market
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list