[ppml] APNIC policy proposal to create a regulated market in IPv4 addresses
Scott Leibrand
sleibrand at internap.com
Mon Aug 6 13:07:06 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] APNIC policy proposal to create a regulated market inIPv4 addresses
- Next message: [ppml] APNIC policy proposal to create a regulated market in IPv4 addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Williamson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:29:27AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote: > >> For that and many other reasons, it would make much more sense (in the >> worst case scenario) for everyone to filter according to the minimum >> allocation size for each IPv4 /8, as published by the RIRs (i.e. >> http://www.arin.net/reference/ip_blocks.html and >> http://www.apnic.net/db/min-alloc.html). >> > > A great idea, but won't they put more value on swamp class C networks? > I can't think of a better way to drive value for a black/white market > in ip space than to differentiate some of it. > I would note that the class C swamp isn't listed on these pages. Where/how to filter legacy classful space is left as an exercise for future operators... -Scott
- Previous message: [ppml] APNIC policy proposal to create a regulated market inIPv4 addresses
- Next message: [ppml] APNIC policy proposal to create a regulated market in IPv4 addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list