[ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy, holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
Cliff Bedore
cliffb at cjbsys.bdb.com
Thu Aug 2 13:37:22 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
- Next message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy, holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
With regards to MIT and or/other /8s that are "privately held", is the internet better off getting those turned in and split up which adds to the routing table or letting the private holder become a default ISP/mini IANA/ARIN in effect with a /8 aggregated address and keep the table smaller? I realize that's not in keeping with current policy but would it make sense (other than to grow MIT's endowment fund)? I would think other companies who got legacy /8s would be even more inclined to go this route since ARIN's control of the address space would certainly be in question. If the number of $65M is anywhere near correct, a company would be well advised to start thinking about this and get the lawyers up to speed. Cliff
- Previous message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
- Next message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy, holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list