[ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
George Kuzmowycz
George.Kuzmowycz at aipso.com
Wed Aug 1 10:09:21 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 (was Re: More on Kremen/Cohen)
- Next message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Saying that markets "might not form" is not the same as saying markets will not form. Lack of liquidity may lead to inefficiencies in pricing, but it does not mean that purchases and sales are impossible. Accountants are able to assign value to all sorts of things that mere mortals consider intangible or illiquid. Probably even some readers of this list work for or have worked for an employer that compensated them at least partially in promises instead of cash (i.e. options), or in things of value that couldn't easily be sold (i.e. restricted shares). Seeing 18.0.0.0/8 on ebay may be the reductio ad absurdum, but on the other hand, is, say, a struggling manufacturing firm with a legacy B more or less valuable as an M&A target than a similar firm with no such IP space? If more valuable, then by how much? I think history shows that market mechanisms are better at distributing scarce resources than central planning is. >>> "Paul Vixie" <paul at vix.com> 08/01/2007 1:49:47 AM >>> in <D03E4899F2FB3D4C8464E8C76B3B68B0C47F64 at E03MVC4-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net> (that's a message-id), michael dillon did a fine job of explaining why a market might not form
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 (was Re: More on Kremen/Cohen)
- Next message: [ppml] alternative realities (was PIv6 for legacy holders (/wRSA + efficient use))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list