[ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
Matt Pounsett
matt.pounsett at cira.ca
Sun Apr 29 10:55:22 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27-Apr-2007, at 00:45 , Martin Hannigan wrote: >> and legacy holders >> should not meet it until they bring their space under an >> RSA (or get a new block under the RSA). > > Aren't strong arm tactics to deny service somewhat > premature? > There are ISP's that are legitimate legacy holders. Carrots > before hammers. Maybe this is a wording problem... I read this the other way 'round, as in: Holding and re-delegating legacy space is not sufficient to be classified as an ISP. Matt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGNLHbae4z2vjbC8sRArG/AKCo0JnU3vbJWdWuGneG0L1GTwReJQCgnoV9 1+PxkA0kzqPSV8WTpOaZJWk= =0XjC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list