[ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
Martin Hannigan
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Fri Apr 27 00:45:07 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-12 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> To: Public Policy Mailing List <ppml at arin.net> Subject: Re: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP" Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:11:14 -0400 > Actually, Owen pointed out the same problem to me. I > might amend: > > Anyone who has number resources from ARIN, a signed RSA, > and falls under the ISP fee schedule. > > The idea being, end users should not meet the requirement, Ok > ASN only holders should not meet it, Ok. > and legacy holders > should not meet it until they bring their space under an > RSA (or get a new block under the RSA). Aren't strong arm tactics to deny service somewhat premature? There are ISP's that are legitimate legacy holders. Carrots before hammers. -M<
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-12 - Abandoned
- Next message: [ppml] Definition of "Existing Known ISP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list