[ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-9 - Staff Assessment
Member Services
info at arin.net
Fri Apr 13 14:21:59 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Staff Assessment
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-10 - Staff Assessment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Policy Proposal 2007-9 Modernization of ISP Immediate Need Policy ARIN Staff Assessment The assessment of this proposal includes comments from ARIN staff and the ARIN General Counsel. It contains analysis of procedural, legal, and resource concerns regarding the implementation of this policy proposal as it is currently stated. Any changes to the language of the proposal may necessitate further analysis by staff and Counsel. I. Proposal Policy Proposal 2007-9 is available as Annex A below and at: http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_9.html II. Understanding of the proposal ARIN staff understands this proposal would change the immediate need policy by reducing the minimum allocation from a fixed /20 IPv4 address block to ARIN’s current minimum allocation as defined elsewhere in the NRPM, and would set the maximum allocation size at a /16 IPv4 address block. The policy also defines a 30 day utilization window of the IP address space. III. Issues and concerns A. ARIN Staff No comments at this time. B. ARIN General Counsel The policy as proposed poses no significant legal risks for ARIN. We also believe that this policy is beneficial because it prevents the waste of resources. IV. Resource Impact - Minimum The resource impact of implementing this policy is viewed as minimum. Barring any unforeseen resource requirements, this policy could be implemented within 90 days from the date of the ratification of the policy by the ARIN Board of Trustees. Implementation would not require the acquisition of staff personnel or equipment. It will require the following: - Revisions to registration guidelines - Staff Training Respectfully submitted, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ##*## Annex A Policy Proposal 2007-9 Modernization of ISP Immediate Need Policy Proposal type: modify Policy term: permanent Policy statement: Modify NRPM 4.2.1.6 to read: If an ISP has an immediate need for address space, and can provide justification to show that the address space will be utilized within 30 days of the request, ARIN may issue a block of address space, not larger than a /16 nor smaller than ARIN's customary minimum allocation, to that organization. These cases are exceptional. Current text of 4.2.1.6: If an ISP has an immediate need for address space, i.e., the need exists the day of the request, ARIN may issue a /20 if the organization, such as a new company, shows justification. However, these cases are exceptional. Rationale: ARIN staff and ARIN members have identified a few long-standing problems with the Immediate Need policy. This policy proposal attempts to address the following concerns: * The Immediate Need policy only allows ISPs to qualify for a /20 worth of space, when a larger size block may be necessary to provide proper coverage for the proposed project. An example justifying larger space is an MSOs for which a /20 is insufficient to put an address block larger than a /29 or /30 on each CMTS in a metropolitan area). * Conversely, this policy was written before the current multi-homed policy (which allows allocations of /21s and /22s). The Immediate Need policy should allow assignment of smaller blocks of space if those are justified. * The example used in the Immediate Need policy gives the impression that an immediate need must exist the day of the request. This seems both unfair and unreasonable and should probably be changed to reflect a realistic timeframe. Concerns expressed about the Immediate Need Policy but NOT addressed by this policy proposal (but addressed in a subsequent policy proposal): * The policy as written allows ARIN to issue a /20 to an ISP only. However, section 4.3.4. "Additional Considerations" of the End User Policy in the NRPM states that "End-users may qualify for address space under other policies such as Immediate need [4.2.1.6] or Micro-allocation [4.4].". In order to be consistent, the Immediate Need policy language should be changed to reflect the fact that both ISPs and end-users can qualify under this policy. Timetable for implementation: Immediate
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-6 - Staff Assessment
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2007-10 - Staff Assessment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list