[ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Apr 9 13:06:27 EDT 2007
- Previous message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Next message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Having once considered how I would go about arranging for secured > email via X.509 or PGP, I settled first on X.509 as it was easier to > document a policy for that. The relationship is "clearer" in that > one side asserts that there is a binding between some cryptographic > data and an identified object. In PGP, with the idea of transitive > trust via trusted introducers the picture became a little fuzzy. nope. do not be confused. the trust relationship is the same in both cases. the contractual relationship with arin binds a public private key pair. the pgp web of trust is not used. randy
- Previous message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Next message: [ppml] mail auth proposals, was Re: the "other"...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list